6 Common AWS Migration Challenges and the Ways to Avoid Them


AWS Server Migration usually refers to the process that automates the movement of your on-premises VMware vSphere or Microsoft Hyper-V/SCVMM virtual machines to the AWS Cloud. By utilizing efficient AWS Server Migration Services to deal with your server relocations, you can: Simplify the cloud movement process. Present day IT situations are awfully complex and dynamic for conventional devices. This is because the technology is still in a very nascent stage and not many people are skilled in it.

AWS traverses almost 100 administrations including analytics, computing, database, systems administration, mobile, and storage.

Numerous ventures have moved a few, if not all, of their server farm data to the Amazon Web Services (AWS) cloud hosting, while innumerable others are thinking about a similar move. The advantages of doing as such are exceptionally engaging. AWS offers a huge suite of distributed computing administrations that give huge, versatile registering limit more rapidly and moderately than an enterprise can fabricate it themselves. You have to give careful consideration to specific parts of the AWS movement to maintain a strategic distance from difficulties and to empower exceptional arrangements for your business. Relocating your site or any sort of information can be an overwhelming undertaking considering the measures of information involved, and that information’s significance to the site and its unwavering quality.

Migration to the Cloud with AWS requires noteworthy arranging and ability and shifting appropriately spares the expense and meets the business destinations. Organizations move to AWS from their inheritance frameworks to receive the rewards of cloud innovation. There are a lot of challenges that would come down your way. You need to minimize them if you want to have a smooth transition. We have compiled a list of the six most common AWS Migration challenges and we have also mentioned the ways to overcome them.

Maintaining User Experience

Commonly, when server farms associate with AWS they do as such through encoded IP burrows utilizing IPSec innovation. Secure, yes. Proficient, not really. IPSec burrows are regularly provisioned from unified server farms, which expand application dormancy and lift the interest for server farm network’s bandwidth.

Related Post:  What are the Roles and Responsibilities of an AWS Cloud Administrator?

Application dormancy rises in light of the fact that a venture needs to backhaul the network traffic that it is facing. This commonly occurs from remote locations to unified server farms through the wide zone network and on to IPSec burrows with the end goal to achieve AWS facilitated assets. In the meantime, server farms should likewise build some tool or program for arranging the transfer speed with the end goal to suit this extra backhauled activity.

Achieving Resiliency

Business undertakings must give careful consideration to keeping up flexibility and administration accessibility for applications and a mechanism for an outstanding workload support should be facilitated in AWS.

AWS gives two strategies to accomplishing a flexible network into client virtual private clouds(VPCs). One is dynamic/backup secure IPSec burrows ending on two excess AWS virtual private passages (VGW). The other is a mix of a protected IPSec burrow into VGW with an AWS Direct Connect benefit that creates a private circuit from the enterprise network into AWS VPC.

Implementing Network Segmentation

Executing security, including system division, while moving assets to AWS, ought to be an essential concern. Regardless of the sort of system division instrument being utilized in a server farm — VLANs, VRFs, VXLANor every one of them — extending it to AWS isn’t something that can be easily accomplished

For most ventures, a division isn’t discretionary. Particularly in ventures that are administered by administrative orders for isolating sensitive data, for example, secret information, monetary exchanges, and patient medicinal services information from different sorts of data traffic channels. Moving applications and information to AWS makes it hard to keep up the segmentation from private on-premises server farms to the cloud.

Centralized Monitoring and Operations

A vast part of the enterprises depend on your monitoring devices to oversee accessibility and execution of their server farm components, for example, applications, workloads, systems, stockpiling, and so forth.

While a portion of these observing instruments may at present be utilized for monitoring assets in AWS, this methodology frequently results in divided perceivability between on-premises server farms and AWS situations. Meanwhile, checking apparatuses and components accessible in AWS don’t reach out into big business conditions and wide region systems. The dissimilarity between on-premises, AWS devices, and working methods makes a single pane of glass observing practically unthinkable. 

Related Post:  Top 7 Reasons Why AWS Is So Successful In The Cloud Space?

Defining Cache Policy with Amazon CloudFront

Despite the fact that Amazon CloudFront helps execute https conventions, it additionally accompanies one consideration. Amazon CloudFront is, at last, a storing administration that reserves the substance at edge areas. It is critical that you characterize your cache policy in the most ideal way imaginable.

At times when the cache hasn’t lapsed, your new updates probably won’t be unmistakable on the site. For this situation, you may need to discredit the majority of the store to make the refreshed page accessible to site guests. Be particular while discrediting: on the off chance that you give non-exclusive criteria it will clear all items including those that have not been adjusted too. 

Amazon S3 Bucket Name Restrictions

An Amazon S3 bucket name has certain confinements. The greatest of these Amazon S3 container name confinements is that each can name utilized on AWS must be one of a kind. For facilitating a static site, it is required for a bucket name to be the same as that of the DNS.

For instance, if your site is facilitated as “xyz.com” at that point the container name ought to be “xyz.com.” Here it is imperative that a similar bucket name is accessible and that it complies with the Amazon S3 naming traditions.


You are now aware of the difficulties that may come your way. Do not be taken aback by them as you also know the ways to overcome them. Be patient and be very careful while diving into the data migration because each bit of data is important for you if you want to leverage proper insights from it.

Write a Comment

Notify of

Download & Learn from Our Whitepapers

Stop, read and acquire deep insights into complex issues